Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/01/2016 7:17:18 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin
"Should that be allowed?"

That's not up to us.

2 posted on 05/01/2016 7:20:05 AM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

and that is why I have no use for biometrics for security access. It is not secure from the government compelling you to provide access, whereas something that you know, can only be compelled via torture, and even then, there are a few that can still resist.


4 posted on 05/01/2016 7:30:53 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Not without a warrant!


5 posted on 05/01/2016 7:34:08 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I’m sick of liberal goons in Government. The answer is HELL NO.


6 posted on 05/01/2016 7:52:01 AM PDT by GOPJ (Imagine the shrieking MSM outrage if Trump supporters had tried to flip a car... David French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Ummmm, no. In fact, hell no. Next question??


7 posted on 05/01/2016 7:52:13 AM PDT by Smokey Stover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

My friend was at dinner with a group of friends. They were talking about phone security. He said why would anybody ever use their thumbprint to access their phone, all your wife has to do is wait until you are asleep and put your thumb on the phone.

They all immediately changed their way to access their phones.


9 posted on 05/01/2016 7:58:10 AM PDT by mindburglar (When Superman and Batman fight, the only winner is crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The government wants your fingerprint to unlock your phone. Should that be allowed?

It must be silly season.
THAT horse has not only left the barn, but there is no signs of the barn left!

If you have a drivers' license, a passport or any other "official" document, Big Brother already has our fingerprints.

10 posted on 05/01/2016 7:58:16 AM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I teach, and in order to become a teacher in Texas you have to submit a full set of fingerprints. Same if you get a CHL, so they have two copies of mine.


11 posted on 05/01/2016 8:22:36 AM PDT by gop4lyf (Gay marriage is neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I’m grudgingly holding to the “rag doll” principle for this question: if investigators can get what they need from your uncooperative (though unresisting) arrested body by simple physical manipulation, it’s legal (albeit very close to the line). They can’t take anything from you (DNA) nor compel you to communicate (right to remain silent), but can photograph, measure, etc. If they can take your fingerprints, they can feed ‘em to a computer and see if it will respond usefully.

In computer security, there is a difference between keys and identification. Fingerprints are identification. Passwords and encryption codes are keys. Both are needed for proper security; don’t rely on just one.


14 posted on 05/01/2016 9:15:32 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“The government wants...”

Words that hearken back to Stalin.


19 posted on 05/01/2016 9:29:07 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
I'll buy the iPone that requires a retina scan. I guess the Feds will want my eyeball.
21 posted on 05/01/2016 9:32:56 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The problem for the authorities in this case is that after a very short amount of time or if the power is cycled, the phone will require the code to be entered manually. So she can press her finger down as much as she wants but it will be of no value. I felt a lot better about iPhone security when I learned that.


23 posted on 05/01/2016 9:33:50 AM PDT by Squeako ( #nevertrump and #nevercruz just may be America's epitaph.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Using a fingerprint as a passcode provides an incentive for someone to cut off your finger, and possibly to kill you so you won't object.
30 posted on 05/02/2016 1:12:37 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson