Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude
She was, indeed. Her conclusions about what she was right about were, however, awfully skewed by her "objectivist" philosophy. I loved AS through most of the book, but the seemingly endless, God-hating screed of Galt near the end almost killed it for me.

The last third killed it for me. I loved the basic dystopian premise she set up in the first two thirds. But the appearance of Galt as Dagny's dream man and the endless speeches by Galt (and Francisco and other characters) really tried my patience. Also, the ridiculous sex scenes between Dagny and Rearden made me snicker. Ayn Rand sure seemed to like men who treated women roughly.

17 posted on 04/29/2016 9:25:52 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Sans-Culotte

AS was clearly a vehicle to detail Objectivism. Nearing the end, Rand needed to wrap up something not conducive to ending, presenting the triumph of her hyper productive heroes vs the total failure of socialism.

It’s something the SJW Left needs to read, but is far too long & sophisticated for them to even consider. It challenges the Left’s stances on welfare, “soak the rich”, the nature of money, sexuality, and the drive of the productive. For a group ranting about diversity, they really need to realize the hyperproductive deserve “justice” too.

Pity Rand gets so wrapped up in pointedly ignoring charity, and demeans religion as she does.

Interesting how “who is John Galt” has entered cultural awareness, but the answer hasn’t (see tagline).


24 posted on 04/29/2016 10:09:06 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson