Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Reason for the Tragedy of the Titanic (Government Regulation)
WSJ ^ | April 12, 2012 | Chris Berg

Posted on 04/14/2016 10:15:40 AM PDT by NRx

In the 1958 Titanic film "A Night to Remember," Captain Smith is consulting with the shipbuilder Thomas Andrews. After the two realize that the Titanic will sink and that there are not enough lifeboats for even half those aboard, Smith quietly says "I don't think the Board of Trade regulations visualized this situation, do you?"

In the run-up to the 100th anniversary of this tragedy this weekend, there's been a lot of commentary about who and what were to blame. Left unsaid is that the Titanic's lifeboat capacity is probably the most iconic regulatory failure of the 20th century.

The ship had carried 2,224 people on its maiden voyage but could only squeeze 1,178 people into its lifeboats. There were a host of other failures, accidents, and mishaps which led to the enormous loss of life, but this was the most crucial one: From the moment the Titanic scraped the iceberg, the casualties were going to be unprecedented.

Yet the Titanic was fully compliant with all marine laws. The British Board of Trade required all vessels above 10,000 metric tonnes (11,023 U.S. tons) to carry 16 lifeboats. The White Star Line ensured that the Titanic exceeded the requirements by four boats. But the ship was 46,328 tonnes. The Board of Trade hadn't updated its regulations for nearly 20 years.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: History; Travel
KEYWORDS: itwassadwhenthe; titanic; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: elcid1970

head on strike would have produced a lot of injuries, but the ship would have remained afloat. At least long enough for the Californian and other rescue ships to arrive.

One of Titanics design flaws was that the watertight bulkheads didn’t extend far enough up. With the “gash” (actually a long series of smaller splits and punctures) as each successive forward compartment filled pulling the bow down, the water began to overflow into the next compartment.


21 posted on 04/14/2016 11:01:57 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace

Post 5 nails it. Doesn’t matter what they did. Not enough maneuverability.


22 posted on 04/14/2016 11:03:14 AM PDT by gr8eman (Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Some of the design flaw fixes were reverse engineered into Olympic. A lot more were built into Britannic.

Iirc one of the fixes built into Britannic were redesigned expansion joints. Put in under the belief (since proven accurate) that Titanic’s stern had quickly cracked then failed and separated from the rest of the hull as it rose into the air.


23 posted on 04/14/2016 11:05:11 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I don't think it's BS at all. And the article disputes the claim of aesthetic reasons for the inadequate number of lifeboats. The main takeaway for me is that government regulations will not save you, and often fail to achieve the aims of the rules. Today they also add burdensome costs with no good result.
24 posted on 04/14/2016 11:07:04 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
What if Titanic had held steady and smashed into the iceberg head on?

Based on the analysis I have read, it would not have sunk. The glancing blow bypassed too many watertight bulkheads.

25 posted on 04/14/2016 11:10:04 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

They did in fact exceed the regulations. It still wasn’t enough. After the tragedy Cunard, the Hamburg Line, etc all had to retrofit their ships. Again the takeaway should be that government regulations are no guarantee of safety. In the modern world they only guarantee insanity.


26 posted on 04/14/2016 11:10:41 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

“Can’t blame it on the government. They did not need to be told that there should be enough lifeboats for everyone on board.”

Exactly.

And there is no reason to believe that if there were no regulations the shipbuilder and White Star would have provided enough lifeboats.


27 posted on 04/14/2016 11:12:01 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

Running at close to full speed into an iceberg field on a moonless night didn’t help matters.


28 posted on 04/14/2016 11:18:12 AM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1
The article states that the original proposal included lifeboats for all on board but that was nixed because the Board of Trade was considered the authority in the matter and there was no need for more. So it's very possible in the absence of regulations that things would have been very different.

On the other hand, Britannic had more then enough lifeboats, and complete bulkheads to the top deck yet she sank FASTER than Titanic. The speed of the ship going under and the extreme list made half the lifeboats unusable.

Again, government regulations won't save you. The idiot captain of the Costa Concordia showed that regulations can be ignored. Regulations do create a lot of paperwork and at times can distract from real safety issues:

29 posted on 04/14/2016 11:28:26 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NRx

I can guarantee you that somewhere in the British government there was a conversation like this......

Clerk: “Sir, I don’t think there are enough lifeboats on this drawing to handle all of the passengers on this ship.”

Bureaucrat: “Let’s let someone else worry about that, eh, laddy.”


30 posted on 04/14/2016 11:28:30 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Interestingly, regulations resulting from the “lifeboats for all” movement after Titanic resulted in roughly 850 more deaths when the shallow draft Eastland, a Great Lakes liner burdened with far more lifeboats than she was ever designed for, turned turtle at the dock.

Legislators were even warned beforehand about adding extra weight up high to ships like these.


31 posted on 04/14/2016 12:00:11 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

I never heard of the Eastland-—thanks.

I’ll now go and read about it. :=)

.


32 posted on 04/14/2016 12:03:10 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Thank you! The Eastland incident illustrates the point I’ve been peppering this thread with. Regulations will not save you. For the victims on the Eastland, they were fatal. And the ship was at the dock at the time!


33 posted on 04/14/2016 12:12:45 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NRx

ping for later


34 posted on 04/14/2016 12:55:49 PM PDT by ducttape45 (Obama's legacy - Christianity outlawed, America shamed, morality destroyed. Need I say more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

Yeah, that’s the one. And it is 100% BS.


35 posted on 04/14/2016 12:58:33 PM PDT by NRx (It's sad when there is no one running for President that I can vote for with a clear conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NRx

One book I read is “The Titanic Story” by Stephen Cox.

You can also find some interesting videos about the Titanic disaster on YouTube.

Leonard Maltin, a British historian, also has a website and some videos online. He’s also written some books.

Yes, the rivets may have played a part. Also, surprisingly, the weather conditions seem to have played a part in altering visibility at sea.


36 posted on 04/14/2016 1:42:05 PM PDT by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NRx

37 posted on 04/14/2016 1:47:06 PM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx
The responsibility for lifeboats came "entirely practically under the Board of Trade," as Carlisle described the industry's thinking at the time. Nobody seriously thought to second-guess the board's judgment.

The free market w/o regulation would help as the manufacturer generally builds based on regulations - the auto industry is the perfect example. The regulations often make little sense - it's a shame.

38 posted on 04/14/2016 1:50:07 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx
The Real Reason for the Tragedy of the Titanic (Government Regulation)
WSJ ^ | April 12, 2012 | Chris Berg

Chris Berg? Iceberg? There's an old joke about that which would probably be considered anti-Semitic.

Of course the theory is nonsense.

But okay, blame an insufficiently demanding regulator for not making greater demands on the company.

WSJ has just made the case for much more and stricter regulation, since companies are too lazy and stupid to do anything on their own initiative.

39 posted on 04/14/2016 1:53:45 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
those same regulations after ward added to the top heaviness of EASTLAND which rolled over in the Chicago River, i believe in 1916.  photo godzilla-titanic_zps79d156a9.jpg
40 posted on 04/14/2016 4:06:22 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson