Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

She's not "becoming" she's been extreme all long.
1 posted on 04/07/2016 10:01:08 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana
" Is Hillary Clinton becoming 'more extreme' on abortion?"

Gee, I don't know? Is Chelsea still around?

2 posted on 04/07/2016 10:03:46 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

more extreme than murder? are they going to use harsh language while murdering the baby now?


3 posted on 04/07/2016 10:06:44 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Yep. She is all about exterminating black children. Don’t know how to get more radical than that.


4 posted on 04/07/2016 10:09:51 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

ABORTION UNTIL AGE 50!!!


5 posted on 04/07/2016 10:10:06 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

She knows that the opinions in Roe and Doe aimed to conceal their radical nature, that after January, 1973, the legal limits on abortion were virtually nonexistent. That was, BTW, primarily to protect physicians. Not just abortionists but the many family doctors who performed abortions in their back offices and were fearful of being sued when things went wrong. IAC, our abortion law immediately became as radial as those of communist states like Cuba.


6 posted on 04/07/2016 10:10:46 AM PDT by RobbyS (```JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Most Satanist are.


7 posted on 04/07/2016 10:12:21 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
It's amusing to watch those on the left do whatever it takes to get elected. Al Gore was pro-life until he signed on as Clinton's Veep. Most people who have a change of heart on abortion turn against it later in life. It is rare to see someone who opposed abortion later decide they are in favor of it. Hillary would probably sacrifice a baby to Molech if she thought it would gain a few votes.


8 posted on 04/07/2016 10:27:05 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana; seawolf101
Fortunately, the Heavenly Father and Creator of those "unborn" human beings has not made that announcement.

Neither did the Framers of the Constitution, in all of their writings, debates, speeches and explanations make such an assertion.

Instead, in the words of Thomas Jefferson:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may DESTROY, but CANNOT DISJOIN them." - Thomas Jefferson
“Give us the grace... When the sacredness of life before birth is attacked, to stand up and proclaim that no one ever has the authority to destroy unborn life.” ~ Blessed John Paul II ~

"America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters

"And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." - Mother Teresa

At the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington DC on February 3, 1994, Mother Teresa stated: “And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?"

Indeed, if we cannot protect the life and liberty of these smallest versions of ourselves, then Mother Teresa's words take on significant meaning.

Clearly, Hillary Clinton's views on life and liberty clash with those of Mother Teresa!

10 posted on 04/07/2016 11:22:28 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson