Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSharp

IMO, the 16th never repealed/superseded the 4th, 5th nor the 13th, so it’s void on its face (regardless of the language gymnastics on either side).

Because our lawyer/politician class has NEVER done anything that they themselves could not drive a Mac Truck through. IE: “Job security”.

There is NOTHING preventing a tie-to clause so we DON’T have *both*.

Concur on the last point: Start from 0, figure what’s Constitutionally necessary and, IMO, make each State/territory pay their 1/x%.


30 posted on 04/04/2016 11:05:44 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73
There is NOTHING preventing a tie-to clause so we DON’T have *both*.

Nothing except the most fundamental principle of republican government: that no legislature can bind its successors.

31 posted on 04/04/2016 11:16:04 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson