Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin

patlin, I don’t understand your point.

Your arguments and points seem to agree with mine.

Are you arguing against my points or in support of them.

It surely seems to me that you also believe that Cruz is not eligible to be POTUS because he is NOT a “Natural Born Citizen”.


252 posted on 03/29/2016 6:26:21 PM PDT by RebelTex (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]


To: RebelTex

My point is that ALL challenges to NBC have been tossed or lost because of technicalities due to the lawyers ignorance of the proper method in which to approach the court which first begins by filing with the court, a proper brief that establishes the key arguments. I have read a lot of the briefs filed and frankly, they are all lacking the key argument, that of the 1868 Expatriation Act and the statutes of 8 USC that deny dual citizenship of any kind, at birth or naturalization. If another country could claim you as having allegiance to them when you were born, then constitutionally, you are a naturalized citizen, period.


256 posted on 03/29/2016 6:50:15 PM PDT by patlin ("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson