My point is that ALL challenges to NBC have been tossed or lost because of technicalities due to the lawyers ignorance of the proper method in which to approach the court which first begins by filing with the court, a proper brief that establishes the key arguments. I have read a lot of the briefs filed and frankly, they are all lacking the key argument, that of the 1868 Expatriation Act and the statutes of 8 USC that deny dual citizenship of any kind, at birth or naturalization. If another country could claim you as having allegiance to them when you were born, then constitutionally, you are a naturalized citizen, period.
Relying on “the 1868 Expatriation Act and the statutes of 8 USC that deny dual citizenship of any kind, at birth or naturalization” is an error (statutes, Acts, and laws are man-made - not natural) and is very dangerous ground in which liberals would love to corner you so they can pass a NEW meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”.
Natural means existing in nature and not made or caused by people, coming from nature. Any statute, legislation, or ammendment that attempts to redefine “Natural Born Citizen” fails by no longer meeting the definition of natural.