Reuters: If GOP Primaries came down to Trump/Cruz, whom would you vote? (Trump 54% Cruz 37%)

Reuters ^ | 3-25-2016 | Reuters

[fortheDeclaration]

Lets just forget about the actual elections and have polls instead!

I think Dewey would have beaten Truman.

[DugwayDuke]

“polls like that at this point mean nothing: Reagan was down against Carter 25 points even after he was nominated.”

Nothing like starting the second half down by 25.

[manc]

really , so Reagan lost too Carter at this point, oh wait Reagan won.
yep only one definition of insanity.

Which speaks volumes of now thinking of voting for cruz.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different results.
Electing another ivy league lawyer and expecting a different results from somebody who did not finish his first term is INSANE.

[TheStickman]

But...we were told Cruz would get all the votes when it was just Trump vs Cruz!!! How is this possible????? /s

[Robert DeLong]

Since you are a Pat Buchanan supporter, perhaps this will interest you.

Here's the tile:

Pat Buchanan: Trump as Nominee Could Transition GOP to ‘a Different, New, Exciting, Robust Party’

[Tupelo]

The problem is, I no longer believe Trump.
Pat may, but I do not.

[Robert DeLong]

So you no longer believe Pat Buchanan either?

[Tupelo]

Oh I believe Pat is honest and straight, but apparently he is more loyal to the PARTY than I.
Nice thing is, I have to explain my vote to no one............yet. But I am afraid that day is coming soon.

[Robert DeLong]

So you see Trump as a Party man. That’s a first as most see him as a Democrat.

[keving]

Is Huma ever happy?

[JediJones]

I’m not paid by anybody. The Reuters poll has been a joke throughout this campaign, always with hugely inflated numbers for Trump.

[tatown]

Hey there little lady you finally woke up from your nap. Trump is beating your boyfriend’s @ss head to head but you don’t want to believe it. Maybe you should skip dinner and go back to bed.