lol
“Mixed Bag of Nuts” - I thought it was about National Review.
This is denial for the three stages of death for the RINO!!
OK, take Trump’s #’s and everyone but Rubio’s #’s.... does Rubio have a path? And so on and so on. Looks like they are using common core math.
PJ ... damn near indishinguishable from: Redstate/NRO/Townhall/PatriotPost/LevinConstitutionalClownShow/WashingtonPost/PuffingtonHost/Salon
At least we seem to have Steyn, Coulter and Fred Reed.
Then there's the small matter of getting the Trump enthusiasts that you just screwed over to the polls in November.
I myself have a laundry day scheduled, in such a pass...
Cruz managed to win his home state of Texas and a pretty good chunk of delegates; if he hadn’t he probably would have been forced to drop out. Cruz also won North Texas also known as Oklahoma and Alaska by 600 votes. So I congratulate him on this, but Trump just plain creamed him in most of the other seven states that Cruz lost and Trump one. Yet now we have articles like this one trying to manipulate the math to turn Cruz’s anemic showing into some type of victory.
Does this fuzzy math really impress Cruz followers? Do they not realize that the make-up of the vast majority of states coming is far less hospitable to Cruz than Texas and the states like Alaska and Iowa that he managed to squeak out victories in. This is why Rubio is refusing to step aside. He is not using the same math that Cruz is.
They've been very accurate so far this year, so I am reluctant to say they are flat out wrong.
What I find is that some other sites are great on election night, but their numbers drop off after 12-24 hours.
Here's my graphic to denote the different figures.
Since when is “non-Trump” a candidate for President? Last time I checked, only one person at a time can be President.