Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

You’re citing definitive criminality to support the ‘beliefs’ that Trump committed a crime. An excellent prosecutorial argument, but beliefs definitely oppose objectivity.


43 posted on 02/27/2016 1:08:02 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric
I cited criminal activity to demonstrate that capitalism is not a cloak for criminal activity, nor is it a cloak for fraudulent activity.

Fraudulent activity can be a civil wrong or it can be a criminal wrong. Ponzi, whom I cited, committed both. If the allegations concerning Trump and his phony University are true, he might well have committed criminal as well as civil fraud.

Trump is entitled to a presumption of innocence in the courtroom but not necessarily in the court of public opinion and certainly not when he seeks the most powerful office in the world.


47 posted on 02/27/2016 1:15:13 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson