Fraudulent activity can be a civil wrong or it can be a criminal wrong. Ponzi, whom I cited, committed both. If the allegations concerning Trump and his phony University are true, he might well have committed criminal as well as civil fraud.
Trump is entitled to a presumption of innocence in the courtroom but not necessarily in the court of public opinion and certainly not when he seeks the most powerful office in the world.

You’re demonstrating your dislike for Trump. And I respect your objections. But you’re also inflating the allegations of dissatisfied consumers to the level theatrical criminality. Should we defer to the BBB?