Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IAMNO1
Drudge is meaningless after that stunt he pulled by changing his poll question to include Trump in the answer even after he sat out the Fox debate.

The result would have been meaningless if Drudge had run the poll asking, "Who won tonight's debate?", when the event didn't include the leading contender for the nomination.

It would have been fair, but pointless, so he asked a different question which prompted a valuable measure of the public's view of the candidates.

18 posted on 02/13/2016 9:32:54 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

“The result would have been meaningless if Drudge had run the poll asking, “Who won tonight’s debate?”, when the event didn’t include the leading contender for the nomination.”

So an Indy 500 race where the leading points getter doesn’t run, it’s meaningless to even show or report on the subsequent race and who rightfully won, because after all, the leading driver never did contend? Yeah, right.


25 posted on 02/13/2016 9:39:56 PM PST by IAMNO1 (If you play chess, vote Cruz. If you play checkers, vote for Trump. Either way, we win, they lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson