[Conservatism means... to conserve... your wealth”. That’s not what conservatism is.]
To look at the majority of elected officials newsletters, that is apparently what it means. The only bills they elaborate on are fiscal in nature; NEVER social issues.
It doesn’t really matter if Trump’s not as “conservative” as Cruz, Rubio, whoever. not like any of them are going to lead on their beliefs. They’re bought and paid for, they’ll do what they’re told.
So if Trump doesn’t measure up to these solid conservative, I don’t care. He’s more than conservative enough for me and he will actually act on what he believes.
They cannot be separated as if one is not necessary. To remove one at the expense of the other puts both of them in peril.