Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Stumbles But Voters Don't Count Him Out Yet (New YouGov Poll)
YouGov ^ | 2/6/2016

Posted on 02/06/2016 10:57:22 AM PST by conservativejoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: CottonBall

>> I’ve listened to him promote ‘legal status’, over and over. <<

Listening to his enemies select sound bites to feed to you is not listening to him. Cruz opposes legal status. He argued that immigration reform was needed, but that the Gang of Eight bill was bad. And he exposed that the Gang of Eight had no interest in making it better by proposing an amendment that would make it less bad.

Everything he said was true:

Did he want comprehensive immigration reform? Yes.

Did he believe substituting legal status for citizenship would make it more likely to pass? Yes.

Did he believe substituting legal status for citizenship would make it better? Yes.

But...

Did he vote against the gang of Eight bill? Yes.

Did he also press for amendments to remove any legal status at all? Yes.

Did he also demand to end birthright citizenship? Yes.

Did he also demand to make the green cards temporary? Yes.

Did he also demand that no legalization would occur until after the border was sealed? Yes.

Did he also explain that immigration hurts U.S workers and perpetuates poverty? Yes.

Did he also support findings that the Gang of Eight bill would transfer a trillion dollars from the poor to the rich, and add another trillion dollars to the debt? Yes.

Now lets look at Trump:

Does he demand illegal immigrants be deported? Yes.

But does he say that he will put them in the front of the line to come right back in as legal immigrants? Yes.

Did he give massive campaign contributions to the people supporting the Gang of Eight, including McConnell and Clinton? Yes.

Did he say a peep to stop the Gang of Eight amnesty? No.


41 posted on 02/06/2016 2:17:08 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Cruz says whatever he thinks will work.

He’s a typical dirty politician.

Iowa proved that.


42 posted on 02/06/2016 2:18:40 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Agreed, it’s a like a school playground for a handful of freepers


43 posted on 02/06/2016 2:37:01 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Dear dunce,

The word “wages” IS “minimum wage”. LOL!! Not saleries, not benefits, but “wages” are minimum wage.

hello? Anybody home?

For the small business Trump is seeing state’s raising minimum wage to $15 per hour.

Small business is laying off because the margin is to small between making payroll at that rate and ability to stay in business and survive.

Get the picture?

Ask small business about high “wages”, especially with a bunch of dang kids beginning their first job, if they are for high “wages”.

TRUMP is saving your job, dearest.


44 posted on 02/06/2016 2:38:59 PM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Oh, BTW, a video of Cruz saying he is for legal status is pretty damning. His own words, just 2 years ago.

Cry supporters are losing their principles - and denying facts.

He lied in Iowa to get votes.
He was for legs status.

You can spin but nothing takes those truths away.

If he would be honest and say he changed his position - that’s more believable. Or if he had retracted that Carson was ending his campaign before Iowa voting was over (when CNN retracted it and when Mrs. Carson corrected a Cruz staff member during a caucus), then I’d belive it was accidental.


45 posted on 02/06/2016 2:39:22 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

typos, but anyone semi-smart can figure it out!


46 posted on 02/06/2016 2:40:18 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Time for a new party!!!


47 posted on 02/06/2016 8:04:30 PM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

The split? Trump 35%, not far off from the next four candidates combined. #2 is Kasich, #3 is Jebbie — not Cruz, not Rubio.


48 posted on 02/10/2016 2:20:52 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson