Thanks for the citation. I think applying a little logic and reason to the question will bring a great deal of understanding.
There’s no question that a person who’s born in the country to two citizen parents of that country, will naturally possess an undiluted allegiance to the country of their birth.
Obviously, it’s possible for such a person to develop an alloyed affinity (or disloyalty), but the probability is stronger that they won’t.
It’s plain to see that the Framers were attempting to provide the best insurance possible that our presidents would possess a natural, inborn loyalty to this country, and no other.
Reminds me of salmon, born in a river, they travel to the sea but always return to the original spawning ground of their birth.
Of course thats a totally ridiculus comparision, right?