Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones

The Framers didn’t define a single word or phrase in the Constitution, but that doesn’t mean we can’t discover what their original intent was.

We need only consult their letters and reference works of the day. Doing so reveals what the common understanding of the terms were at that time.


40 posted on 02/06/2016 2:50:03 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
It is widely accepted that the constitution is written in the language of the English Common law and the English Common law is clear as to what a Natural Born Citizen is and isn't.

All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.

Justice Swayne, United States v. Rhodes, 1 Abbott, US 28 (Cir. Ct. Ky 1866)

46 posted on 02/06/2016 3:00:25 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson