VANITY: What DEM are you rooting for?

2/1/2016 | Me

[ObozoMustGo2012]

Ok.... we ALL have our favorites we are hoping for to win on the GOP side, and let's face it, it's getting very hairy!

Let's take a time out from tearing at each other's throats over Trump, Cruz, etc. Let's flip the coin for a second....

Who are YOU rooting for on the Dem side to win?

BERNIE or HILLARY? Why??

I'm still torn who would be the most easily beatable, and IF they one, who would do the least amount of damage to the country...

[Hugin]

See #19.

[PastorBooks]

I saw what you did there.

[Fresh Wind]

Which one will appeal most to the free **** army?

I’m guessing Burnout Sanders would be the one.

So it’s Hillary for me!

[mountainlion]

50 years for Hillary.

[ek_hornbeck]

I think the bigger question is who the DNC will back if Hillary is indicted or is otherwise proven to be damaged goods. I don’t think they’ll allow Bernie to be their standard-bearer: the crony capitalist wing of the party doesn’t like him and he’s unelectable. They’ll push for someone “safe” like Biden in a brokered convention.

[Pollster1]

If the usurper is not replaced by a conservative, I no longer care who is next. America will not survive as a free country unless we quickly start rolling back the encroachments on freedom from these eight terrible years. We can openly declare we are socialist under Bernie, we can rapidly move toward an all-powerful dictator under Hillary, or we can watch freedom wither and die under Jeb/Christie/Rubio/Kasich, but it doesn’t matter which one of those paths we choose, since the destination is the same.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum.”
(If you want peace, prepare for war)
- Vegetius

I want peace . . . but I want full freedom, with all of our God-given rights that are enumerated in the Bill of Rights even more.

[justlittleoleme]

LOL

[Resolute Conservative]

We have a winner!

[DouglasKC]

I actually think Hillary would be the easiest to beat. She has so much baggage she needs a 3 ton forklift to carry it. Lots and lots of targets.

Me too but Sanders would be a target rich environment as well. Can finally make people understand what a communist is.

[dowcaet]

Exactly. The socialist signs and banners are already appearing at Sanders “marches”. A great campaign commercial against Sanders would be a montage of him at various speeches with images of the socialist signs in the crowd with the old Soviet anthem playing in the background. End the commercial with Marx, or pick any of your long dead communists, and morph his silhouette into Sanders image. Maybe a little over the top, but we’re trying to save our country. Cruz is too programmed to do something like that, but we know Trump would do it.

[Pravious]

I’m rooting for Hillary.

I’m so scared that half our country has been dumbed down by the “educational system” and media that they’re willing to sell out America entirely and turn the country communist, just so they could get “free stuff” from Uncle Bernie.

I like to think there’s enough functioning brain cells in many leftist’s brains to dimly perceive that Hillary is an unreliable, lying, corrupt has-been. Many will vote for her - but I just can’t see the enthusiasm being there. Consequently, I think we’re more likely to win against her than against the socialist pig.

[chajin]

Bernie won’t make deals, which is why the DEMe would undercut him in the general election: they would rather have a Republican to kick around for 4-8 years, especially one who delights in doing deals.

[ObozoMustGo2012]

[Hillary, and I am praying she is not indicted.

I want Trump to beat the living sh*t out of her first.

Then, a year from now, turn the FBI lose on her.]

I agree that HRC would be the most beatable, but I worry that she will either be indicted or drop out due to “health concerns” and either Shotgun Biden or Fauxcahontas will take over. If that happens, prepare for a liberal tsunami!

[biff]

What concerns me with Commie Bernie is all the young folks that are getting on his bandwagon. If they come out in force I fear we will have another 2000 and 2012.

[Drew68]

IF they won, who would do the least amount of damage to the country.

Sanders. In the unlikely event he actually won, he won't get anything done. He'll be a placeholder, that's all, hobbled by both parties in Congress.

[Suz in AZ]

“Sanders would be a target rich environment as well. Can finally make people understand what a communist is.”

Time for an ad playing part of a speech of his over the backdrop of pictures of empty grocery stores, dilapidated buildings, poor health care, boat people, etc. Utopia sounds great, but the reality is different.

[camle]

hillary....whoever wins is gonna pick lizzie warren for veep, and that would make a formidable ticket. hillary is the weakest link - sanders does not have her negatives...THAT’s who we need to guard against - warren

[nascarnation]

Hillary for sure, she’d be a soft target in Nov.

But I think somehow Biden winds up as the D nominee.

He’ll be tough to beat, a much stronger candidate than Hillary.

[Mr. Jeeves]

I honestly think Bernie means well and wants to do right by the average American - he just has no clue how to do it, and even less that his Socialist policies will bring misery and ruin to the middle class in much greater proportion than any possible good they can do for the lower class.

Hillary is an outright criminal, and bought-and-paid-for by everyone from Wall Street to the Muslim Brotherhood. So the choice is obvious.

[MomwithHope]

Neither, Biden will probably be the nominee.