Ever notice how they rarely have photos of the actual find? Paleontology is a very “interpretive” science, so the appearance of fossils is often missing a large percentage of the remains of the organism and the “scientists” have to interpret and extrapolate, often from fragmentary evidence. The theory of evolution heavily relies on these methods.
I clicked on the link hoping to see a picture.
“The theory of evolution heavily relies on these methods.”
Sure, but over the past 150+ years many tens of thousands of such examples have been found & analyzed.
Each new fossil fills in another piece of the puzzle, from which the larger picture takes clearer & clearer shape.