Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

Except the “smoking gun” document referred to a non functional secure fax, so the issue wasn’t the location but expediency of transfer to a presumably allowed location via improperly insecure means.


36 posted on 01/09/2016 10:01:20 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
Except the “smoking gun” document referred to a non functional secure fax, so the issue wasn’t the location but expediency of transfer to a presumably allowed location via improperly insecure means.

To get from location A to location B, the info had to travel via the unsecured phone system. The unsecured phone system can be considered an "unauthorized location".

40 posted on 01/09/2016 10:17:00 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: ctdonath2
the issue wasn't the location but expediency of transfer to a presumably allowed location

I'd disagree.

If someone in the State Dept is sending something (anything) to a .gov address, then there is at least the possibility that the transfer is happening to an allowed location. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. But it COULD be.

Hillary's email is a .com.

No way, no how is that an allowed location. The transfer method is insecure AND the destination is not allowed.

The guy at State knew this. Hillary knew this. They are all fully trained.

41 posted on 01/09/2016 10:18:11 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson