As stated previously, I have researched. Departmental collusion and corruption is a difficult thing to keep in line. The question is the same.
That being said, the concept that the sheriff's department planted the murder victims car, and the burned remains of the woman on the Avery property is pretty far fetched.
I found Avery's murder defense team to be very sketchy. They went all high and right over the hole in the top of the test tube of blood. Have they never had blood drawn before? I think their frame up defense was a very poor decision. There is a big difference between raising a doubt about the state's case and directly accusing the police of planting a car, a body, blood and DNA evidence.
I also would like to know if the jury polling results stated by the defense team in their discussions with the family are correct. It seems really weird that they started out 7 innocent, 3 guilty, and 2 undecided, and then got to a unanimous guilty verdict.