So why did you use them to claim the stock is undervalued?
Because, in addition to my Economics major, I have a second degree in Finance, and according to Apple's underlying fundamentals, with the profits it's turning out, its forward looking PE, no matter how you look at it, AAPL is woefully undervalued and the idiotic anal-cysts who jump on the least negative baseless rumor, like you, and those who manipulate the valuation through publishing FUD headlines based on lies, again like you, are wrong.
The majoritarian analysts who are looking at the same data I am are right. They rightly ignore the baseless rumors and recognize the failures of the repeated nabobs of negativism who have been beating the same drum for years and been wrong for years. Why should anyone give them any weight at all with a track record like theirs of years of being losers?