Of course its click-bait.
They dare publish something that wasn’t praising Apple to the heavens, so its pure FUD.
It's obvious you did not even bother to read the article. There are TEN reasons listed in the article why the headline is WRONG. That is why the HEADLINE is click bait FUD. The main thrust of the article DENIES the main point of the headline. That is very definition of click bait, VanDeKoik. Negativity sells. . . and negative headlines about Apple garner far more clicks than do positive headlines about Apple. That is just a fact. Editors know this and will prefer a negative slanted headline however they can pull one out of an article, no matter what because the point is to get eye on the advertising on their pages.
My charting show AAPL going down 30% more next year. Those who remain married to it will find out the hard way. Get back to me next year at this time
AAPL will hit 73 next April and stay there. It will be a good hedge against capital gains/ Xiaomi will rise 20% in the new year
Sell Apple stock and buy Netflix stock.
Pundits have been “predicting” Apple’s demise since the 1990s. Your comment is silly.
Did you actually READ the article? If not, then how can you post such an inane accusatory reply?