Posted on 12/03/2015 7:45:40 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
He should be offered 5 minutes to waltz into the girl’s locker room, shower, and get dressed. THEN the girls can make use the facilities. Anything else is about getting to expose himself and to get an eyeful of voyeurism.
He’s got the room if he needs it. His goals are something else.
Now black people like Spike Lee are busy complaining that white people are moving into the one he grew up in (but no longer lives in) ‘changing it’ and ‘driving up property costs’ so black people can’t afford to live there anymore.
I’m sure his best solution is to burn down all the white houses. Rich White People should not be allowed to live in nicer places than anybody else.
I had to deal with a man who thought he was a woman at work.
He needed everyone to validate the delusion to be happy. Announced as woman, immediately at the women’s luncheons, women employee groups, in the bathroom, etc. It wasn’t enough to wear the dress, makeup, hair. It attended events, as soon as it could, asked for a welcome and gushed how great it was to be there, then took over fawning and seeking attention.
It couldn’t be happy walking into the women’s room but tried to chat up women who were there, discussing “female” topics.
It was like someone who thinks they are Napoleon unable to be happy dressed as Napoleon in the corner, but must have everyone else calling them the title to truly be happy.
That’s SOME Napoleon Complex.
The worst part was, it was sanctioned by top management per diversity guidelines, so women’s rights were irrelevant.
You see the same thing when feminists are attacked for not liking Bruce Jenner getting women’s top awards or the “top paid female CEO” going to someone who was a man for 40 years.
But federal government contract rules give points to companies that have more diversity policies, not only affirmative action based on race but hiring the sexual minorities. If you have more formal policies to support these people like letting them use facilities they self identify with and so forth, you’re more likely to get the government contract.
And socially engineering your work force is way easier and cheaper than trying to build a better jet at a lower cost, when competing for billions in federal contracts.
It’s pushed corporations in bed with liberalism (who then push it on the employees with ‘diversity’ and ‘compliance’ training and political re-education).
Crony Communism
All four big defense contractors voluntarily meet the Out and Equal Index 100% because it gets them points in competing for federal contracts.
It is social engineering pushed via federal contract awards. They change because they want the money.
Why do they put faggots on the board of directors and make CEOs and VPs out of them?
Not strictly in defense industry but across the board in corporate America. For 2% of the population, they sure rise in the ranks. Sleep their way to the top? Blackmail against those they’ve ‘slept’ with?
No kids or much of a family to slow down the career for most of them.
A VP at Microsoft boasted in a mainstream interview about having a sex dungeon in his home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.