Posted on 11/24/2015 12:44:53 PM PST by PROCON
:-)
and what ever you do .. do not tell them how that 97% number was generated...
Next up, The Grand Inquisitor of the Climate.
Followed by burnings at the stake.
With minimal carbon emissions, of course.
How to talk to a Warmist Cultist: screw you.
PS, out here on the Edge of Forever (the West Coast), it’s raining hard today. Third time in 2 weeks.
And on Sunday the whack jobs staged a climate change demonstration. Next one will be rained out...gurgle
Not to mention the temperature data...
Ya gotta love libs.
They actually need a tutorial on what to say when meeting someone with a different viewpoint.
Ain’t tolerance grand ?
.
97% of scientists agree? I wonder how much money these “scientists” are being paid to get with the left-wing program.
If someone would pay me millions of dollars to appear in public and say that dog crap tastes like candy, I would appear in public and say that dog crap tastes like candy.
It’s no different than doing what these so-called scientists are doing.
If they're using the Cook et al study to justify the 97%, that has been comprehensively debunked. Not 97%
“Studies suggest...studies suggest..” I interpret that as “there is no proof...there is no proof”.
Yeah, but you’d have to PROVE that dog crap tastes like candy :-)
There is a John Waters movie called Pink Flamingos that delves into that very subject.
Last I remember, there was not a step in the scientific method for consensus.
The facts are, the 97% number is bogus.
There has not been any global warming for the past 18 years.
NASA has artificially altered the raw data to show a warming trend.
All of the models are broken and thus have failed the scientific method.
I did once. Behind their eyes, I saw the hamster fall off the wheel and land on his face.
Iask them if they know what a Trace Gas is. What % of the atmosphere is CO2 (I’ve gotten some really bizarre numbers with that question!) Ask them what % of the CO2 is man made? Don’t give them answers. Make them do their own research.
If they look at graphs, point out what the scale is. “It’s not in degrees Lulu! It’s in hundredths of a degree! The big jump in the red line is 0ne one hundredth of a degree, not ten degrees Lulu!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.