Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham

I see, the letter is based on the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, not the Kentucky Resolution of 1799 which I was referring to. Even still in that set of 9 resolution is an implicit indication of desire to preserve the Union and a stated dedication to that compact.

This still it centered on an enumerated verses implied interpretation of the Constitution which was a major issue of the time, and not secession.


339 posted on 12/22/2015 3:11:04 PM PST by CougarGA7 ("War is an outcome based activity" - Dr. Robert Citino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: CougarGA7
"Even still in that set of 9 resolution is an implicit indication of desire to preserve the Union and a stated dedication to that compact."

You may be aware of the letter that the Continental Congress sent to King George pledging their desire to preserve their union with England and to settle their differences peaceably. The summer of 1775, after Lexington and Concord. King George didn't buy it and declared the Colonials to be rebels and traitors.

I'd put the wording of the Resolves in the same vein. An attempt to smooth over some very real differences when conflict was already baked into the cake. George Washington didn't buy the Resolves desire to preserve the union and could see that the Compact Theory of Jefferson and Madison implied nullification and probably disunion.

341 posted on 12/22/2015 4:38:01 PM PST by Pelham (Muslim immigration...the enemy is inside the wire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson