Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The city of San Mateo and their Revenue Officers knowingly violated California law (for the third time), and operated for profit red light cameras with shortened yellow light timing, causing rear end collisions.

More fine examples of concerned Public Servants wise administration of duty.

1 posted on 11/12/2015 8:48:50 AM PST by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Navy Patriot

Please...the shortened lights “caused” the collisions?


2 posted on 11/12/2015 8:52:35 AM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

Governments are about taking your money.

Not providing “services”.


4 posted on 11/12/2015 8:58:17 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Illegal journalists driving down press wages would be reported as an economic calamity. ~ Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

Read the headlines and couldn’t figure out what area of San Mateo was the red light district. Around here they are called stop lights not red lights to avoid the confusion. Sort of a soda or pop thing


5 posted on 11/12/2015 8:58:23 AM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot; All


If You Haven't Donated Yet This Quarter
Please Remember To Help
The FR FReepathon

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

8 posted on 11/12/2015 9:01:30 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

Our company has HQ there in San Mateo. I read a local paper there last year they were complaining about the roads and that the state didn’t pony up the promised funds allocated for repairs. Revenue generated theft of citizens by traffic cameras. We survived quite well without traffic light cameras for many decades until the rip offs by government
trying to trick drivers into trap$.


9 posted on 11/12/2015 9:01:32 AM PST by tflabo (Psalm 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

The overwhelming majority of these citations are issued to those going through the end of the cycle, where vehicles in other directions are already stopped, waiting for the green.

This kind of light running is an annoyance, not a safety issue.

Show me one pic of such a red light runner getting into an accident.

Millions of photos - none of accidents.

That a 100% safety rate.

So what exactly is so dangerous about running lights in this way again?


15 posted on 11/12/2015 9:16:35 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

$540 fine. That’s a lot of freaking money to some people - including me.

It’s all about safety. Not.


16 posted on 11/12/2015 9:16:38 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot
The city of San Mateo and their Revenue Officers knowingly violated California law (for the third time), and operated for profit red light cameras with shortened yellow light timing, causing rear end collisions. More fine examples of concerned Public Servants wise administration of duty.

Bilking citizens is endemic in California at every level of government.

I prepare tax returns for a client that lives and operates a pretty large business in the bay area. They constantly get notices they're being audited by every county where they have stores, for personal property taxes and no matter what the truth is they always generate more tax by counting some items twice, or by saying an item should be reclassified into another category that has a higher tax rate. The auditors ignore everything I say, because the outcome has been predetermined. The audits are literally a shakedown and completely immoral.

Any entity that can tax or charge a fee is giving everyone in California an anal exam just to increase their revenue. How else are the dimocrats going to pay for their illegal voters?

20 posted on 11/12/2015 9:26:59 AM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

They are not constitutional anyway....


22 posted on 11/12/2015 9:42:14 AM PST by Vendome (they arDon't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Navy Patriot

The people there should do what Tucson voters did last week. They got rid of the red light cameras, period.


25 posted on 11/12/2015 10:41:04 AM PST by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Later in the article...

Clemente, with the help of NBC's Investigative team and Los Angeles resident Jay Beeber, who advocated for the new law, claim a video of the Burlingame man's ticket shows the yellow lights were set to just 3.066 seconds, below the former 3.2-second minimum.

I was stuned when I read this.

(Do any Freepers still remember being stuned because of a beeber-like device?)

30 posted on 11/12/2015 11:44:32 AM PST by Kyrie (He is risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson