Posted on 11/08/2015 1:51:06 PM PST by PROCON
STOCKHOLM (AP) -- Climate change could push more than 100 million people into extreme poverty by 2030 by disrupting agriculture and fueling the spread of malaria and other diseases, the World Bank said in a report Sunday.
Released just weeks ahead of a U.N. climate summit in Paris, the report highlighted how the impact of global warming is borne unevenly, with the world's poor woefully unprepared to deal with climate shocks such as rising seas or severe droughts.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
OMG, we’re all gonna die.
The ban on DDT and other environmental wacko actions fueled the spread of malaria!
IF the earth warms up agriculture in Sweden will boom. They will be able to grow crops like never before as the growing season expands.
An additional benefit will be a reduction in winter heating costs and energy usage.
Fools, dupes, and dopes.
The bankers have found a new scapegoat.
Is "climate change" the cause of the predicted harm or is falling for the hoax the cause.
We all know there were no poor people in the world before the evil Westerners started driving SUV’s and using heat and air conditioning.
Global politics - the global socialists’ class warfare and race and religion demonization will be interesting to watch develop when they have the power to cut off those they hate.
100 trillion people will die from climate change!!!
These eco-criminal all have misshapen heads. What malignancies.
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Obama rejects Keystone pipeline
Funny Weather? Must Be Global Warming / Cooling / Whatever We Want To Call It Today
Sen. Mike Lee: Preempt Bid by âSmugâ Obama to Bypass Congress on Global Climate Deal
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
I think Climate Change is actually code for Socialism.
Only 100M? That’s way better than the 4 or 5 billion we presently have. What’s their downside?
Of course I didn’t read the article; that would break tradition.
Only 100M? That’s way better than the 4 or 5 billion we presently have. What’s their downside?
Of course I didn’t read the article; that would break tradition.
How can you separate those who will be pushed into extreme poverty by climate from those pushed into extreme poverty by all the socialistic responses to climate change?
Do they already know how to tell the difference?
Of course not!
That’s because there is no difference. Whatever happens the socialism will exasperate it on the down side and restrain it on the up, helping the bad to be as bad as it can be and the good to be as mediocre as it can be made to be.
The “A” part of “AGW” is bunk ... climate change, either warmer or cooler, is always gonna happen, but the “S” part of Socialistic Globalized Nitwittery is inherent no matter if the nitwits are Mensheviks or Bolsheviks.
There is over 100M poor now, so climate change is proven!/sarc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.