[MinuteGal]

In the history of all artistic endeavor, whether acting, singing, dancing, painting, sculpture, cartooning, miming and the like, there are artistes who do the conventional, the traditional, the bizarre, the outrageous, the spoofing, the serious, the funny, the mocking, the un-conventional, the outlandish, the un-explainable and the stupid.

The SNL bi-polar-wig act was any one of the above entertainment forms you care to choose depending on what rings your bell...keeping in mind there are different strokes for different folks in the cultural and entertainment worlds.

An act is not bad just because YOU don't like it, nor is it good just because YOU like it.

I rather enjoyed the number, the singer's voice and styling was good, the "costume" was interestingly way-out from the humdrum, and the music had a good beat.

For those who can't tolerate any unexplicable deviation from the norm in the artistic world, it's probably best they never visit a Salvador Dali museum...his bizzaro genius would cause a genuine meltdown and gnashing of teeth upon viewing his works.

Leni

[MinuteGal]

Re: your comment on another thread....please see my #37 above.

Leni

[I-ambush]

I thought her voice was pretty good, as was the music itself; certainly not my cup of tea.
However, in the realm of art, there is better and worse that doesn’t depend on genre. The performance art part of the show was silly and contrived, and I agree that she would have done better to let the music speak for itself.

[Rusty0604]

I thought she had a good voice.