To: sparklite2
Climate Scientologists everywhere sob into their pillows.
2 posted on
10/30/2015 8:17:07 PM PDT by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: sparklite2
.. degrading satellite sensors?
How could this be???
3 posted on
10/30/2015 8:19:52 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: sparklite2
I blame polar bear poop. They'll have to be hunted to save the Earth.
4 posted on
10/30/2015 8:20:21 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(CNBC = Clowns Neutered By Cruz)
To: sparklite2
Boogy-man Carbon exonorated again.
5 posted on
10/30/2015 8:20:50 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
To: sparklite2
It helps when you keep your lenses cleaned.
7 posted on
10/30/2015 8:22:22 PM PDT by
Slyfox
(Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
To: sparklite2
Attention! Attention! The end of the world has been delayed...
9 posted on
10/30/2015 8:24:28 PM PDT by
RickGee
To: sparklite2
Huh! So human activity (or the lack thereof) really is causing global warming. Howzzaboutdat?
11 posted on
10/30/2015 8:37:09 PM PDT by
davius
(You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
To: sparklite2
"Greenland has gained almost 200 billion tons of snow and ice over the past two months, which is more than 50% above normal. The surface of the ice gained more than 200 billion tons during the previous 12 months.†
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/10/29/greenland-blowing-away-all-records-for-ice-gain/
14 posted on
10/30/2015 8:42:27 PM PDT by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied, Otto von Bismarck)
To: sparklite2
15 posted on
10/30/2015 8:43:12 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: sparklite2
this will be an ignored article but this really has to be worse(or more important) than some think.
If these sensors degrade, then other sensors degrade.
Do climate data models account for degraded sensors ? If so how ? when does degradation start ? how much ? etc...
16 posted on
10/30/2015 8:45:42 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(obama = Fredo Smart)
To: sparklite2
if we are to save the planet we have to get better sensors for are satalights. its the sensors causing global warming.
17 posted on
10/30/2015 8:46:20 PM PDT by
PCPOET7
To: sparklite2
They’ll just find another way to spin this so we’re all still doomed.
20 posted on
10/30/2015 9:12:53 PM PDT by
Bullish
(Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
To: sparklite2
24 posted on
10/30/2015 11:10:12 PM PDT by
Cyman
To: sparklite2
Even if soot were falling on the Greenland glacier, it would be covered-up regularly with every snowfall.
28 posted on
10/31/2015 7:27:02 AM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: sparklite2
Oops. Yet another black eye for the warmists. How many will it take?
Typical of leftist “science” as all the facts have to be changed with every revelation of another truth in order to maintain the anti-freedom anti-God agenda.
To: sparklite2
But a new Dartmouth-led study shows that degrading satellite sensors, not soot or dust, are responsible for the apparent decline in reflectivity of inland ice across northern Greenland.However, climate scientists quickly noted that the deterioration of the satellite sensors was likely caused by global warming, providing yet another example of the damage caused by CO2 emissions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson