[DH]

Why is this so hard to believe?

---

I don’t think you were able to comprehend my response to the article. It was not whether women influenced the lifestyles, it was the fact that these “experts” had absolutely no way to come up with “hard” proof to support that statement. How could they? There was no tangible proof, simply conjecture.

My statement has nothing to do with women’s equality...it has to do with “so called experts” coming up with beliefs rather than proof.

Global warming is a perfect example of today’s “experts” coming up with fake and false statements to support their agenda.

[Ohioan]

The notion that there is such a thing as true equality among humans, or any advanced species of life, is really absurd. Just how does one define equality? One can frame a mathematical equation; but one cannot devise a measure or equation that will precisely define any human.

The sexes by the very nature of sexuality, complement each other. Both are absolutely essential to human continuity; but pretending that equality, rather than to complement, is a rational purpose or goal, is to superimpose a neurotic wish list over what is actually functional.

Why does it matter? Well for one thing, truth is always important. But it is the unfortunate side effect of egalitarian pursuits that is the real crux. The Egalitarian pursuit promotes jealousy, envy, resentment, rather than constructive development of all the useful traits where people being compared, are actually able to excel. The areas where anyone has a particularly useful quality, should be their focus; not a need to pretend that they can be great at whatever they set their minds to. (And Reality Is Not A Grievance.)

[trisham]

There was no tangible proof, simply conjecture.

**********************

Exactly right.