They'll find pr0n on the internet.
But in my opinion, the real tragedy of this change in Playboy is the loss of RESOLUTION.
Playboy centerfolds were carefully done photographic artworks (at least, long ago they were, I haven't looked at a centerfold in 20 years). They had some careful airbrushing and such, but overall they were very high resolution film photos, not digital. And as such, they could be used as lessons in how to do photography of the human body.
The pr0n on the internet is a travesty, in terms of photographic quality.
And that is IMO the biggest shame of this turn of events.
But but but....as our dear reader is so fond of saying....it’s only fair that everyone has the same level of opportunity. What about those poor, deep in the country persons who are not electronically capable of viewing any item that might be found in cyber space. The only way they are introduced to anything would be over the counter or by mail. A tasteless magazine which has seen its day come and go. The art is so unimportant unless it is seen by an eye of a professional. Like everything, we cast aside the old to provide the way of ‘better’ How many times has that been said? Like the Sears and Roebuck catalog...the times they are a’changing.