Questioning a conspiracy theory is not a crime on Free Republic. Question it to your heart’s content.
If I were making the decision, however, I’d boot your ass for this alone:
_________________________________________________________
BuckeyeTexan - If Obama were working against us ...
coop71 - Psssst: he’s not
_______________________________________________________
Lucky for you, I don’t get to make the decision.
Obama is working against us openly and secretly. He doesn’t need to use microwave technology or weather machines or LSD or any other so-called conspiracy.
He is in the most powerful position on the planet. He has a phone and a pen. He does what he wants when he wants with few negative consequences, politically or legally.
He embarked on his own grand adventure to fundamentally transform America and the GOPe are disinclined to acquiesce to our requests.
“Psssst: he’s not” still needs an explanation, eh?
“coop71 to BuckeyeTexan
Working against us how? Because if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings for gun control, it’s most definitely not working.
Psssst: he’s not.”
If you read what I wrote, I asked how Obama is working against us, written with the assumption you were implying ihe was working against us through these mass shootings. With this assumption in hand, I immediately offered the example question of “if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, it’s most definitely not working”. Then I finished by saying “psssst: he’s not”, implying, “Hey, here’s a sarcastically poised answer to my own question: he’s not working against us by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, so try again”.
If you still want me banned, go for it.