“Psssst: he’s not” still needs an explanation, eh?
“coop71 to BuckeyeTexan
Working against us how? Because if its by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings for gun control, its most definitely not working.
Psssst: hes not.”
If you read what I wrote, I asked how Obama is working against us, written with the assumption you were implying ihe was working against us through these mass shootings. With this assumption in hand, I immediately offered the example question of “if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, it’s most definitely not working”. Then I finished by saying “psssst: he’s not”, implying, “Hey, here’s a sarcastically poised answer to my own question: he’s not working against us by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, so try again”.
If you still want me banned, go for it.
I’d like to see you plainly state that Obama is actively working against conservatives. Aside from that, any explanation you offer is a convenient afterthought.
Your posting history is pretty clear to me. You aren’t here for intellectual discussion and debate with conservatives.
Unfortunately, the moderators aren’t at my beck and call. So, carry on.