[Longbow1969]

LOL, The National Enquirer is only marginally better than the Weekly World News.

Yes, they got a story or two right, but it isn’t a publication to be taken seriously.

Hillary Clinton may pass away, but if she knew she was terminally ill she wouldn’t be running. It would be pointless and stupid.

[JennysCool]

It would be pointless and stupid.

Just like the rest of her political career.

[utahagen]

Longbow1969, your description of the National Enquirer is more then three decades outdated. They play games with headlines because there's wide latitude legally when it comes to headlines, but their stories are carefully vetted by the same lawyers the Clintons hire. When you read their articles in their entirety carefully, it is very clear which ones are openly reporting the mere rumors of a few and which ones are actual, accurate news reports.

[Grams A]

but if she knew she was terminally ill she wouldn’t be running. It would be pointless and stupid.”

You know we are talking about Hillary Clinton, right? If she does die while running for office, then Chelsea could promise on Hillary’s death bed to run in her place or sometime in the future.

[1010RD]

The real story is who paid to plant this story?

[generally]

>> if she knew she was terminally ill she wouldn’t be running. It would be pointless and stupid.

There could be plenty of reasons to be running. She could be some sort of decoy candidate, setting up the sympathy vote for Biden, creating chaos, or something else. The libs always say “never let a crisis go to waste”. Their evil knows no bounds.