No smoking. No drinking. No pot use.
Wouldn't that allow them to fire at-will dope head employees? I mean if I came in drunk after lunch, they'd fire me in a heartbeat, let alone being stoned.
That’s what he’s saying - he kept having to fire people and couldn’t replace them with pot free employees. I find this article fishy.
Pot smoking has always been overlooked. Heck, I worked for a big firm in NYC and I used to see all the mailroom guys wreathed in a cloud of smoke on the front steps when I went out for lunch. Needless to say, we had problems with misdelivered mail...but it was obviously ok with the bosses, who seemed to believe it was a cultural (black) thing.
Even when my son went to high school in CA in the late 80s, the kids were literally getting stoned in front of the school. If they’d been getting drunk they would have been arrested, suspended or whatever. But getting stoned is a liberal thing, so it didn’t matter that they came back after lunch, put their heads on the desk and ignored whatever was theoretically being taught.