To: Yashcheritsiy
After about 31,500 generations, some finally cracked the code and changed. Evolution promoter Richard Dawkins wrote that this was “a beautiful example of evolution in action,” and that “creationists hate it.”No that's adaptation. Show me the critter that evolved into a humming bird or a mouse and then I'll think about it.
6 posted on
10/01/2015 6:29:52 AM PDT by
pgkdan
(But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: pgkdan
It comes down to the source of the information and ability to change.
Is it built into the critter (creation)
or is it “added” by mutation (evolution).
Which is more likely to produce the results we see?
12 posted on
10/01/2015 6:35:32 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: pgkdan
Evolution is adaptation. It is natural selection. No one ever said you will have a duck giving birth to a lizard.
44 posted on
10/01/2015 9:13:32 AM PDT by
JimSEA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson