Looks like many of us really were right. Given the situation in Russia right now, the F-22 would be a great deterrent and a threat to the Soviet invasion in the ME.
To: InsidiousMongo
2 posted on
09/30/2015 10:53:54 AM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
To: InsidiousMongo
Well don’t they have to spend OUR money on Syrian refugees, Mexican refugees, and all the South American refugees.
After all we are a racist country! We don’t need no stinkin’ fighter’s to protect our country!
3 posted on
09/30/2015 11:05:03 AM PDT by
notaliberal
(St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
To: InsidiousMongo
If you had enough F22s, you could afford a fleet of dirt cheap A10s to fill out the force. But noooo, we have to spend a $trillion on a paperweight.
4 posted on
09/30/2015 11:06:43 AM PDT by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: InsidiousMongo
To: InsidiousMongo
“You’re going to need the Raptors” for a high-end fight, he saidIn a "high-end fight", what's the anticipated loss rate? And how fast can the lost ones be replaced?
13 posted on
09/30/2015 11:59:16 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
To: InsidiousMongo
i’m really tired of people doing everything that can to hurt or weaken this country and never being held accountable for it.
19 posted on
09/30/2015 12:15:27 PM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: InsidiousMongo
I’m not really up on what planes fly what missions, but could un-mothballing the F-117 help? From reports last week they are still being flown to remain air worthy.
21 posted on
09/30/2015 1:22:12 PM PDT by
DAC21
(.z)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson