To: 1raider1
Because a lot of people don’t know that L=50 in Roman Numerals, and because it doesn’t look right to many.
2 posted on
09/27/2015 3:49:06 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: Dr. Sivana
I agree with your position. I presume there’s been a LOT of educational regression in the forty years since Super Bowl X.
16 posted on
09/27/2015 3:54:14 PM PDT by
1raider1
To: Dr. Sivana; 1raider1
Not only that, imagine “SUPER BOWL L” written in cursive.
Many in the later generation would think it’s a foreign language.
18 posted on
09/27/2015 3:55:23 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: Dr. Sivana; 1raider1
Last year should've been IL for 49. Didn't they use something different?
Super Bowl L would look weird. It's a shame. Now no one will have a reason to learn Roman Numerals.
27 posted on
09/27/2015 4:00:19 PM PDT by
grania
To: Dr. Sivana
I’m not gonna be around for #69......but I can just imagine the jokes!
55 posted on
09/27/2015 4:49:39 PM PDT by
bobby.223
(Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson