Free Republic
Browse · Search 		General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored; bolobaby
Another Swordmaker LIE that he makes so glibly. This was such an offensive tactic, that the Admin Mod removed Swordmaker’s post. Easy enough for him to lie about it now, I guess, but he and I both know it happened. My “Minions, attack!” response is still floating around as some proof that it occurred.

No, you are right. In that instance, I did indeed bring the question of your complaints to the entire Ping list. . . because you were hitting me constantly about not even having a large list of people who were interested in Apple on other threads that day. It seemed to be the attack mode of the day for the group of Anti-Apple Hate Brigade members. So, as I recall, I asked the members of the list if they were interested.

That was not why the post was removed, because there was no offensive material in as far as I can recall. I am certain that Dayglored would recall that thread as he is on the Ping list. . . and certainly any offensive comment I may have made would've been comment on by others. It was not. Ergo, it was not there.

YOU somehow got that question deleted by the Admin Moderator because it was certainly NOT an insult to you and it certainly was not a PING for the list to a post of YOURS, although as I recall it did indeed refer to your consistant behavior, with which most were already familiar.

Please note the subsequent attacks from some of his Ping List using some incredibly offensive terms. (”Anal bleeding,” for example.)

LOL, I thought that one was particularly funny and appropriate due to your rude and offensive behavior.

All right, let's look at all the attacks on you from the members of the Ping list that so "offended" you (you seem to be easily offended by a lot of things). . . and see whether the Freepers in the thread you linked are upset about Apple threads, or YOU.

Supporting Apple threads in green
Opposing posts in in red
Neutral posts, in black.

Attacks on you will be quoted in their entirety in bold.

Although I am going to cite Freepers names in this listing, I am not going to ping them, because I am not addressing them in this post. I really do not want to bring them into this again. . . but they are on on the original thread. Any of you who see this, please pardon me for not following protocol.

Topic of thread is about Apple starting a free repair for defective MacBook Pro screens that had developed problems after warranty had expired and would have been of interest to any MacBook Pro owner. Certainly not something that can be construed as an Apple "advertising" and one that would be of interest to all Freepers with such a laptop, whether they were members of the Apple Ping list or not. Yet bolobaby attempted to hijack the entire thread (by the 14th post) to an attack on me as a "paid social media marketer for Apple," as he always does.

Replies pre-deleted post 21:

Replies post reply 21:

So, before the request for members of the Ping list to chime in on whether they agreed with you or not, there were already EIGHT positive comments on the thread, to your TWO attempts to hijack the thread. Afterwards, only TWO other Apple haters showed up, Utilizer and Exosmagnum (who was such a piece of work as an Apple hater he got himself completely banished from Freerepublic by the boss himself for his misbehavior on Apple threads!) Between them and you, they accounted for a total of 14 more anti-Apple replies. . . out of 62 of which 43 were absolutely positive for the thread and were from 37 distinct individuals.

So, out of 82 posts in the thread, we have a total of 16 negative Trolling comments for a total of THREE apple hating individuals, including YOU. That leaves 52 totally positive of which 45 told you to STAY OUT of Apple Threads.

Only NINE of those can even remotely be considered attacks on you. . . and most of those are extremely mild, compared to the constant barrage of what you have posted against me. Frankly, I don't blame the ones who got more than mild against you. They've had enough of your bilge.

Do you have a problem with getting the message that you are far outnumbered and that you and your constant barrage of noise and hijacking attempts of Apple threads are simply not appreciated nor welcome?

64 posted on 09/25/2015 6:05:16 PM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

There you go with a wall of text. Either you are getting paid by Apple or you need some psychiatric help.


68 posted on 09/25/2015 7:06:10 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]
To: dayglored

Holy crap. Look at how delusional his last post is. On a thread *where he admits pinging his ENTIRE list to come attack me*, he tries to point out that - *gasp* - more people come on the thread to... ATTACK ME! Surprise! Who would’ve thunk?

Now for some general untruths related to this exchange:

1. I had nothing to do with his call to attack being deleted. Obviously someone else thought he crossed the line and either reported him to the Admin Mods, or they stepped in themselves.

2. He claims post #24 was one of mine that was deleted. Really? Post #24 was an attack by one of his minions that was offensive enough that the Admin Mods removed the post independently. Similarly, I believe posts 37 and 44 were the same - ultra offensive attacks at me. In fact, you can see in post 31 that I abandon the thread. If you doubt this, why are there no responses to 24, 37, and 44? Wouldn’t someone have said something to me? Every other post of mine generated multiple responses.

3. *He calls #26 a “paranoid assumption” - yet he ADMITS to calling in his ping list???

Now, it *is* true that I dropped in on the thread to point out what Swordmaker denied in a prior thread, that’s he’s not a one trick pony, only posting about Apple. I went back something like 5 pages and it was all Apple posts, all the time. That was my point of being there in the first place. I just joined the last of 5 pages of Apple posts to point out he lied about that.

So, look man, I’ll stop pinging you on this. I only kept you in the loop because Swordmaker was putting you back on the thread. You probably could care less, so I’ll spare you any more, even if Swordmaker keeps trying to pull you back in.

The bottom line is to watch out for this guy. He’s a pathological liar. It’s actually quite easy to catch him in lies. Even in this post, for example, he contradicts himself. “OK, I did sic my Ping List on you” vs Bolobaby has a “paranoid assumption that Swordmaker has ordered the Ping list members to attack.” Incredible, right? Maybe he’s social marketing on multiple sites and having trouble remembering which persona to adopt even in the middle of a post. I dunno, but he is vehement in his defense because it hurts his business to get called out. He can’t afford to lose credibility as a paid social marketer, so he doesn’t drop it. If someone came on a thread and said, “Bolobaby, you are a paid social marketer for Android,” I’d say, “Yeah, OK, whatever,” and probably just drop it. Swordmaker is unable to drop the topic whether it comes from me or someone else because it directly contradicts what he does.

And, lest I become like Swordmaker and become overly obsessed, I’ll probably drop this whole thing for a couple of months until I get the itch to call out the advertiser in our midst again. (But don’t worry - Swordmaker will market for Apple non-stop in the meantime.)


79 posted on 09/25/2015 8:40:51 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search 		General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson