Posted on 09/03/2015 8:50:56 PM PDT by hapnHal
.the lady clerk (ELECTED OFFICE) in Kentucky sits in jail, and was offered freedom if she allowed assistant clerks to sign QUEER MARRIAGE LICENSES
.she refused once again. When she took office there was no legal QUEER MARRIAGES, The rules were changed by the SCOTUS, but they DO NOT WRITE LAW, they enforce, and clarify existing law. The federal QUEER MARRIAGE LAW is NOT A LEGALLY written law, by Congress, therefore it is Constitutionally not enforceable. She will now be eligible to file a huge lawsuit against the Judge who found her in contempt of court. She was duly PUBLICALLY ELECTED to her post, so now we have precedence against the SLIMEY San Francisco Mayor and his cohorts. He refuses to enforce Federal law also. Now he too should be given some slammer time to think about it. This is exactly the same thing except with a religious aspect added, I reiterate an ILLEGAL LAW was used as a charge against her which resulted in her being jailed by a Federal judge who is paid by Soetoro. THE SCOTUS DOES NOT WRITE LAW, WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY DONE. THE LAW IS FATALLY FLAWED, BECAUSE THEY REFERRED TO TWO PEOPLE OF THE SAME GENDER,AS MAN AND WIFE. THE WORD WIFE IN WEBSTERS COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY IS DEFINED AS A WOMAN, NOT A MAN. This illegal law was PUT UPON Ms,Davis AFTER she was elected to her county clerks position. While she agreed to uphold the laws of the state of Kentucky, she DID NOT AGREE TO UPHOLD PERVERTED FEDERAL LAWS. Sadly the appellate court upheld HER contempt citation. This tells me that the judges are still the alleged GOOD OLE BOYS CLUB of YESTERYEAR.
.and much like DOGS HIND LEGS, which makes them KANGAROO COURTS. Hopefully I will live to watch this all get shoved right back down the Soetoro cohorts throat. I joyfully congratulate her for standing her ground against the SICK, TWISTED MALE BASTARDS who were trying to get married. btw ONE OF THEM REFERRED TO HIS QUEER LOVER AS HIS SOON TO BE WIFE. I BELIEVE THAT SUCH A REMARK TELLS THE STORY AS TO HIS SUBHUMAN MENTALITY.
Because Kentucky law says,says that marriage licence is between a man and a woman not homos.
Refer to Kentucky law.
The gays might have a case if Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis was issuing marriage licenses to normal people but not the gays but in fact she is issuing them to no one and there is no Kentucky or Federal law demanding such. Only long standing custom and partly because the counties make money from issuing them.
In a way Kim Davis and her county government are going Galt. Dropping out of the marriage license game because the gays have polluted it
Exactly. The two queers were on the news and both of the them were standing at the counter asking Mrs Davis why she was denying them a license. You could hear the two faggots getting upset and speaking to her in queer talk. Hilarious.
Hey, I don’t even play a lawyer on TV.
Your reply is the rational one.
There are many legal inaccuracies in this thread that I won’t go into, but the concept that each person decides what is Constitutional and therefore legal, and what is not is simply another description of anarchy.
Secondly, the concept that one’s religious principles override legal ones is also very dangerous. What if someone decided that no one working in her office could eat meat on Friday? If it is argued that we are a Judaeo-Christian country, what if a Jewish office holder, or Christian Seventh Day Adventist, demanded her County office be closed from sundown Friday through sundown Saturday?
Also, there was a much easier legal out here. Governor could simply have removed her from office and made the entire matter moot.
All in all, you are very right. If you feel you are entitled to break the law, be ready to pay the price. We may commend you for it, but you will still be in jail.
But contempt of court is against the law.
That is the law she broke.
Sounds like the have to stamp them with her name, which is what she disagrees with.
Which in this case is fiat.
You make a very reasoned argument.
I don’t think most of us care.
She is taking a stand against judicial tyranny.
The legitimacy of the judicial system rests upon the people being in agreement that the judges are fairly interpreting the law. The Supreme Court is increasingly losing that agreement, and thus losing what gives them authority.
The Founders warned us, it’s shame so many pay them no heed.
The judge is the the son of former GOP Senator Jim Bunning.
NUTS!
I sympathize with your opinion but as a matter of civil law and by analogy, clerks were obliged to register 18 year-old voters even though the law required voters to be 21 when the clerks first took their jobs. IMHO, this clerk should simply have resigned in protest; the civil law will be observed until changed.
The way one acts defines one's personal beliefs. One cannot act contrary to one's personal beliefs.
James 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
I heard Huckabee say that Lincoln didn’t follow the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott case because SLAVERY was evil!!! God Bless Kim Davis.
Good point. States rights.
I dont think most of us care.
Put this on FR's tombstone.
Because her name will still appear on the license. A judge has offered to sign the docs. but the gays will have nothing of it.
They want to force Davis to sign the licenses.
If there ever was an example of Political Prisoner, this is it.
No, but the Federal Government did by violating her 1st Amendment rights! Impeach the Federal Judge!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.