Skip to comments.
NASA Completes Its Third Cessna Crash Test
Popular Science ^
| 8/28/2015
| Atherton
Posted on 08/27/2015 6:49:49 AM PDT by Purdue77
NASA Completes Its Third Cessna Crash Test.
Popular Science (8/26, Atherton) reports on Wednesdays crash test of a Cessna aircraft by NASA as part of a study to try to improve emergency location transmitters (ELTs). This third test involved a tail-first crash into soil, which flipped the plane but didnt crush it in on its crash-test-dummy occupants so much.
(Excerpt) Read more at popsci.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: cessna; crash; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
I conducted a crash test in 1978 with a Cessna 152 when I stalled it about 12 feet over the runway. I survived. My flight check instructor survived. And, the airplane survived. I also passed my check ride. Don't know if the ELT activated.
1
posted on
08/27/2015 6:49:49 AM PDT
by
Purdue77
To: Purdue77
Well, any landing you can walk away from...............
To: Purdue77
when I stalled it about 12 feet over the runway. Sounds like my normal landings...
3
posted on
08/27/2015 6:54:36 AM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: Purdue77
how the hell did you fit two grown men side by side in a C152? :)
4
posted on
08/27/2015 6:55:32 AM PDT
by
Axeslinger
(Where has my country gone?)
To: Purdue77
Heh. While I doubt you stuck the landing after stalling at 12 feet, how many times did you ‘land’ so to speak?
The landing gear of the 152 are quite resilient ;-)
5
posted on
08/27/2015 6:56:52 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: Purdue77
Stalled a 152? Hummmm.....Glad you and the instructor were OK.
6
posted on
08/27/2015 6:57:18 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Section 20.)
To: Purdue77
I’ve gone up in hundreds of Cessnas, haven’t landed in many, though.
7
posted on
08/27/2015 6:58:50 AM PDT
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Blueflag
“The landing gear of the 152 are quite resilient ;-)”
One of my first night landings proved that. Man did I hit hard.
8
posted on
08/27/2015 7:01:33 AM PDT
by
CrazyIvan
(I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
To: Blueflag
Coming in for my first solo, I was a little high, the sun visor fell in my lap, all went well for the next two take offs and landings!
9
posted on
08/27/2015 7:05:40 AM PDT
by
Empireoftheatom48
(God help the Republic but will he?)
To: gorush
10
posted on
08/27/2015 7:06:49 AM PDT
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: Empireoftheatom48
I was a little high
Weed and speed don't mix.
11
posted on
08/27/2015 7:16:02 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(Winter is coming)
To: Purdue77
Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing.
12
posted on
08/27/2015 7:25:08 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
To: headstamp 2
13
posted on
08/27/2015 7:27:04 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: mad_as_he$$
indeed....the 152 is used by beginners precisely because it is so darned hard to stall out
14
posted on
08/27/2015 7:27:56 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Nifster
C-152 is a hard plane to land. Heavier birds are easier to land IMO.
15
posted on
08/27/2015 7:29:47 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
didn’t say it was easier to land....said it was very hard to stall out
16
posted on
08/27/2015 7:45:49 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Nifster
With full flaps a C-152 is very hard to stall.
17
posted on
08/27/2015 7:46:39 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Purdue77
Did they have ELT’s in ‘78?
To: SpinnerWebb
Not that kind of high! Lol
19
posted on
08/27/2015 8:01:41 AM PDT
by
Empireoftheatom48
(God help the Republic but will he?)
To: AFreeBird
The 152 (N18528) that I flew in 73 had one.
20
posted on
08/27/2015 8:10:20 AM PDT
by
CrazyIvan
(I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson