[Gratia]

“Cruz has been fighting the GOP E and the Democrats since Trump WAS STILL A DEMOCRAT.”

CEM: a prudent person, examining Trump’s background, would be very cautious about his close connection to the Clintons.

A prudent person could not possibly know if Trump is actually helping his good friends, the Clintons. But that is exactly why a prudent person would not rule it out, because it is impossible to know.

As Trump said about his bankruptcies, it’s legal! Forget honor, ethics, morality and competence. It’s all about the chumps!

Helping Hillary is perfectly legal. And The Donald wouldn’t try to bamboozle chumps about that, would he?

[C. Edmund Wright]

yeah, agreed....the operative word being "prudent." By the way, one of the best ways to understand a concept is to look at the opposite: For example, have we seen any of the following going on?

imprudent adjective a series of imprudent marriages: unwise, injudicious, incautious, indiscreet, misguided, ill-advised, ill-judged; thoughtless, unthinking, improvident, irresponsible, shortsighted, foolish; rash, reckless, heedless. ANTONYMS sensible.

[grania]

Ohmygosh, this is going to be confusing. We're probably 100% in disagreement about everything, and our names differ by just one letter.

Do you really think Trump is helping hillary? Have you seen that most recent short video? It vilifies her with a visual impression of her complicity in Benghazi that will never go away.