Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: uncitizen
I hate it when I have to explain the obvious, BUT here goes. I was responding to the literal (and hence very stupid) statement
"Purposefully harming helpless animals is the hallmark of a murderer-in-training."
The person who made this statement didn't qualify it, and without qualification it states that harming animals means you're going to be a murderer. So anyone who harms any animal according to the quote is going to be a murderer. Total load of cow squeeze. Or maybe in this case duck squeeze.
39 posted on 07/27/2015 10:51:16 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: from occupied ga

The three behaviors of potentiality for future serial killers (at least back in DSM-III days) were bedwetting, firestarting, and cruelty to animals or other children.


59 posted on 07/27/2015 11:43:26 AM PDT by sockmonkey (Of course I didn't read the article. After all, this is Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: from occupied ga

Oh I see. I didn’t read that statement as literally as you did. I understood it to mean dogs and cats and other house pets.


67 posted on 07/27/2015 2:42:38 PM PDT by uncitizen ("When a liberal speaks, a liberal is lying" - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson