Posted on 07/19/2015 8:29:46 PM PDT by Crystal Palace East
So what does your group say was Obama’s underlying motivation to even make this deal with Iran?
A lawn party on a Sunday night? Don’t they get enough of one another at work?
Can’t get s-faced and chase each others’ wives at work.
Who did they “reveal” this secret fo’ shizzle to? One another?
And trusted old “walk a mile in my moccasins” friends.
They have to get a load on to express their true feelings about “OHK”?
I don’t, but I’m not still on the gubermnt t*t.
Do I ask too many questions?
What questions?
Thx for your service and thx for the lawn memo
Obama’s thoughts?
Can only report mine. He hates Israel, and a strong America. It’s that simple.
Kerry is even easier. At Paris Peace Talks, in ‘72, Lt. Kerry, USNR, was all but the NVA/PAVN/VC spokesperson. He never changed. He just better at hiding it.
Thanx, but just an old school Mer-can.
A compliment is like a pocket full of money,both are prosperity,say thank ya and go on
Wow. When you are stuck working for a crap company and a crap boss, there eventually will be a point when you realize, why am I working for these people. After leaving Ambassador Stevens to be raped, tortured and brutalized for hours, you still think they give a rats behind about you or us ? Now that is loyalty. In the real world, what happens in the US now is irrelavent. Why ? Because the US made itself irrelavent. The only nuclear superpower in the Middle East right now is all that matters. And DC incompetence has united them in a way they rarely are.
This would fit his policy of paying off pirates for hostages... with bombs to bomb us!!!
This is the exact language he is seeking.
Could be. Thanks for the heads-up.
I can more easily picture them scheming to spit one final time in our faces by releasing the Iranian scientist and never intending to get our hostages back. But maybe that’s just me.
Now that’s funny!
Your thoughts?
Bkmrk for later...will be interesting to see if the career govvies are correct.
Anyone you talked to, lawn party or not, is out of the loop.
Tomorrow/Monday morning the Iran deal gets voted on by the UN, not by Congress, and what Congress is voting on has no bearing on what the UN approves.
0bama has (essentially) bypassed Congress by making this a UN deal instead of a USA treaty.
...and you’ll be scrambling to explain why our 4 hostages haven’t been released.
Sorry, but the UN is all about PR, has nothing to do with the legal requirement that he send it to Senate, which he just did. Sunday, I think.
If people believe that these people were held for an extra few months in prison so Obama could score points he won’t have the political muscle to to do anything ever again. Think about how cynical this is.
I’m not saying this isn’t the case mind you but only looking at this from the standpoint of whether it becomes the common perception. Take it one step further to be truly cynical if Obama senses this could become a negative issue he can just tell the Iranians he doesn’t want them back, they would be a liability to his legacy.
And should Congress pass such a resolution of disapproval, Zero can veto it unless it passed both houses with two thirds in favor.
IOW, the RINOs lowered the bar. No way would Zero get two thirds of the Senate in favor of his abominable and detestable cave-in. However, he might well get more than a third of either house.
Days ago, I predicted what you predict::
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3312890/posts?page=17#17
“I suspect that the prisoner release is a very secret part of the deal. Obama will pull it out of his nether orifice at the moment he needs one more vote to get the deal through — if it ever gets to a vote.”
If you answered yes to any of the above questions you get a gold star.
Cynical but plausible. Depends on how much information that is in the treaty comes out. Iran doesn’t care one way or the other they got $150B.
This is the inside from many of the people there. Obama did not put the release of 3 of the American hostages in Iran into the announced Iran Nuc Deal, because he is holding the release of that information as a trump card for when Senate takes up "confirmation" of deal. In reality, Iran never did care about hostages. They can always grab more next month... Obama can lose big in either of two ways here. If deal is declined by Senate and his veto overridden... and deal dies, he loses big politically, here and abroad. If his veto is not overridden (initial disapproval vote is assured) and deal goes into effect, 75% of America will be very angry after all the televised hearings, etc. So, regardless of pass or fail, Obama loses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.