Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Always A Marine

They were in a military office doing a military function. As such they are now a domestic target of foreign and domestic terrorist groups. Keeping at least sidearms should be allowed even off duty especially in Uniform of the day. The idea that the military has to lock up all it’s small arms weapons is a newer idea evolving from the 1900’s. Remember when our nation was founded it was Bring Your Own Weapon.


38 posted on 07/16/2015 11:50:31 AM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: cva66snipe
After it came out that members of the military were specifically targeted for terror attacks, Sgt Mr. niteowl77 Jr said that any E-6 or over should be given the option of carrying a sidearm. I don't know his reasoning, but I tend to think he is correct.

Mr. niteowl77

49 posted on 07/16/2015 12:04:21 PM PDT by niteowl77 ("I wish I had better news for you, but the truth is that this thing is not worth fixing anymore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: cva66snipe

A large part of it is that the brass doesn’t want to have to deal with the bad press from the inevitable negligent discharge events that would occur if service weapon carry was more common.

I don’t say this because I’m against it, quite the opposite. But that is the reality of the situation.


61 posted on 07/16/2015 12:12:59 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson