Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
After it came out that members of the military were specifically targeted for terror attacks, Sgt Mr. niteowl77 Jr said that any E-6 or over should be given the option of carrying a sidearm. I don't know his reasoning, but I tend to think he is correct.

Mr. niteowl77

49 posted on 07/16/2015 12:04:21 PM PDT by niteowl77 ("I wish I had better news for you, but the truth is that this thing is not worth fixing anymore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: niteowl77
After it came out that members of the military were specifically targeted for terror attacks, Sgt Mr. niteowl77 Jr said that any E-6 or over should be given the option of carrying a sidearm. I don't know his reasoning, but I tend to think he is correct.

All of our service members should as me or you have the GOD given right to protect themselves and family from harm. If they don't have the common sense and discipline to know how to handle a sidearm and when and where to use it then they have no business being in the armed forces to start with. At least two in any smaller place like a recruiting office should be armed. At FT Hood all E-6 and above should have been armed.

64 posted on 07/16/2015 12:16:18 PM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson