Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Yes, I know Mach 5 is faster, but I was thinking if we have gone from 2200 mph nearly 50 years ago to potential 3300 mph near future, that is not as impressive as it first sounds.


50 posted on 06/30/2015 2:59:17 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Truth29

“Yes, I know Mach 5 is faster, but I was thinking if we have gone from 2200 mph nearly 50 years ago to potential 3300 mph near future, that is not as impressive as it first sounds.”

Agreed. If you think of aviation and military aircraft capability improvements between 1940 and 1970, and then compare to changes between 1970 and today, I think one word that could describe the situation would be “stagnation.”

This plane would have been hot stuff in 2000, even, but today the Russians already have hypersonic interceptor missiles that are likely to be able to take this plane out. I’d say it’s kind of like one of those cigarette boats from Miami Vice — real fast, real showy, and not much practical use. I hope I’m wrong.


59 posted on 06/30/2015 3:25:05 PM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Truth29

We don’t know what the Military Industrial Complex is developing at any given moment from the Skunk Works. They may be working on a ‘futuristic’ engine that will go Mach 10 for all we know right now. Or a Anti-Gravity device that will make all other forms of transport obsolete, who knows?..........................


62 posted on 07/01/2015 6:14:24 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson