OK maybe I’m dumb, but could you expand just a bit on the meaning of the phrase “a self-limiting mental category.”
Doesn't matter if there's baby in the lap or baby in the crib.
The original news story had to mention that the victim was "bi-racial".
You are completely missing the approved narative, so let me clarify:
From the protected-class perspective, she is a race-traitor and therefore no hate crime is done.
From the oppressive-majority perspective, it's racist to even be talking about this.
There, much simpler, isn't it? Now go eat your peas...
I think the implication was: “Don’t worry white people, the victim wasn’t white, nothing to see here.” If the attacker was white and the victim was black it would be the national outrage of the week with wall to wall television coverage but since the attacker was black it was not a national outrage, it was not a hate crime and it was not a civil rights offense.
This video went viral on youtube, so the media controllers saw that they had been blindsided by the new media. They head to get out ahead of the crisis so that white America would never see any incidents of white victims of black crime. We are only supposed to see black victims of white injustice, then it becomes a televised national story. That is the narrative that we have been seeing for many years—black victim, white racists. This one went against the narrative so they had to work quickly to change peoples’ perceptions. Whites must always feel guilty.
the current OccupyWH resident is one after all.
Just curious: what has this to do with the scumbag Mark Udall?
DEGENERATE CULTURE
To the left the violence doesn’t matter because it is a Negro attacking another person the left is careful to characterize as a half Negro. Is that attitude racism? Nah- not possible. Leftists cannot be racist because they make the definitions.
It’s hard to tell what you’re making up if there’s no link.