Oprah is the richest woman in United States, who did not inherit her money. And she is black. I give her lot of credit for her amazing success.
But do not post innuendo’s about Trump wanting Oprah for Veep. Trump was asked that question during a TV interview on a liberal network. Trump laughed and said something like “Oh sure, why not”.
Posting a remark made in jest as policy makes the poster look either a tool of another candidate, or unable to understand difference between jest and serious policy statements.
Who's posting innuendos and false reports?
Here's the facts from Link :
"Trump initially posed the idea of running for president with Winfrey on the ticket as his No. 2 in 1999, when he briefly considered launching a bid for Reform Party."It was not a jesting response to a media proposal.{And this time (2015) he} "admitted in an interview taped Tuesday that he would consider asking the former talk show host and media magnate to add her name to his campaign ticket as his vice president. "
"“I think Oprah would be great,” Trump told ABC in an interview slated to air on “Good Morning America.” “I’d love to have Oprah. I think we’d win easily, actually.”"
"“She’s great, she’s talented, she’s a friend of mine.” {and} “She’s a good person.”"
Not only was it Trump who "posed the idea" of Oprah as VP, but he did it first in 1999. And Trump did not confine his 2015 statement to just Oprah as a VP but went on without prompting to praise Oprah personally. Yes, praise the woman who used her TV show to launch Obama’s presidential campaign and was part of Jeremiah Wright's anti-White & anti-American church long before and after Obama.
But what should we expect from the man (Trump) who says Clinton was the best of the last 4 Presidents and who has given as much campaign contributions to Democrats as to Republicans {mostly RINOs)? [Google "trump best president" and "trump campaign contributions" before making any unsupportable accusations on these 2 facts!]
Who's the "tool" of a candidate and who's "unable to understand difference between jest and serious policy?"
But as I said in post #35 "I've agreed with and would defend Trump on his stands & statements on the issues recently but those could be only the mega-saleman reading the public and telling them what he knows they want to hear. He shows me no reason to trust his commitment to his promises after he makes the sale."