Don't get you bowels in an uproar.. they said that it's not racial. /s
Don't get you bowels in an uproar.. they said that it's not racial. /s
Which makes sense because the child in the video looks bigger than the baby in that photo.
Got it!
Someone on Facebook said the photo of a baby is a child with a cat scratch.
If you google “cat scratch baby,” you’ll find the photo at the link below in an article about a cat attack on a baby:
That baby was in the UK, and the photo was taken 3 years ago.
That must be why the photo has been removed from some of the websites that first posted it along with this case.
When you think about it, it makes no sense that this would be the photo: The child victim in the attack is 3 years old, not a baby. Also, the victim’s family has not gone public, so the media shouldn’t have a photo of the child.